Our Town Hall

Background to the Masterton Town Hall Issue

Since 2016 the Town Hall and Municipal Buildings located at 64 Chapel Street have been unoccupied. The Municipal Building (which is physically attached to the Town Hall) was once occupied by approximately 70 council Staff. There are ongoing maintenance costs associated with the two buildings, even though they are not being used for their intended purpose.

This image below is an overhead view of the Town Hall site,  showing that there are actually multiple buildings that comprise what is known as the Town Hall, notably the "L" shaped Municipal Offices (where council staff used to work), and the Civil Defence Building (which is still occupied by Civil Defence staff). 

Most of the attractive "facade" is part of  the Municipal Building.

Several plans for the future of the Town Hall and Municipal buildings have been proposed and discarded. Around $1M has been spent by Masterton District Council on developing these plans. This is $1M of ratepayer money which has been largely wasted. The public has held well attended protests against some of the proposed plans, notably an unpopular plan to demolish both the Town Hall and Municipal Buildings.

Ultimately the "Town Hall Issue" is what to do about ongoing costs of the unused buildings, and what to do about the amenity lost to the residents of Masterton as a result of the buildings no longer being used.

Some Relevant Facts

Frequently Ask Questions (FAQ)

Question: Could all council staff be accommodated back into in the Municipal Building after it was earthquake strengthened?

Answer: At least 110 of the current 139 staff (as at 2024) could be accommodated. It is not clear if this figure could be increased by not housing the "archives" (currently in leased premises) or how many of the 139 staff are based elsewhere (eg Library, Aerodrome, Animal Services etc).

Question: Would Waiata House still be required if the staff moved back into the Municipal Building?

Answer: In council documents it is stated Waiata House would still be required, however it is clear only a small part of the building would be required to house staff not based in the Municipal Building.

Additional Reading (Documents of Interest, click to view or download)